Comparative Effectiveness of Long-Acting Injectable Versus Oral Antipsychotics in Patients With Schizophrenia Using the Prevalent New User Design and Subgroup Analyses.

BACKGROUND: We compared the effectiveness of long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) and oral antipsychotics (OAs) in treating schizophrenia, focusing on whether the benefits of LAIs over OAs are evident even in the prevalent new user design and on effect heterogeneity. METHODS: We conducted a prevalent new user cohort study using 2 administrative claims databases in Japan. We included patients with schizophrenia initiated on LAIs and propensity score-matched patients on OA. We compared the risks of psychiatric hospitalization and treatment discontinuation based on hazard ratios (HRs) using the Cox proportional hazards model. Effect heterogeneity was evaluated using subgroup analyses. RESULTS: In total, 2520 patients using LAI and OA were identified as matched cohorts. Long-acting injectable antipsychotics were associated with a higher psychiatric hospitalization risk than OAs (HR, 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.88) in the entire population; however, LAIs were associated with lower risk in the group with a low proportion of days covered and psychiatric hospitalization history (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.30-0.89). Long-acting injectable antipsychotics were associated with a lower risk of treatment discontinuation than OAs (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.66-0.87) in the entire population; in the subgroup analyses, a consistent trend was observed in all strata (LAIs had a lower risk). CONCLUSIONS: Using a prevalent new user design, this study confirmed that LAIs have an advantage regarding treatment continuity. Long-acting injectable antipsychotics had higher psychiatric hospitalization risk than OAs in the entire population; however, this study suggested the presence of effect heterogeneity due to psychiatric hospitalization history.

Factors Related to Treatment Non-Adherence Among Caregivers of Pediatric and Adolescent Growth Hormone Deficiency Patients in Japan.

Background: About one-third of caregivers of pediatric or adolescent growth hormone deficiency (pGHD) patients in Japan have reported poor treatment adherence. However, few studies have examined factors related to adherence for that group. Objective: The aim of this study is to consider factors related to poor adherence to daily treatment among caregivers of pGHD patients in Japan. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among caregivers of pGHD patients in Japan. Caregivers were asked about demographic and treatment characteristics, health literacy, treatment satisfaction, opinions about treatment, and treatment adherence. Health literacy was assessed using the 14-item health literacy scale (HLS-14). Adherence was assessed using the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8). Statistical association with adherence was considered using Chi-square and Student's t-testing. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and K-means cluster analysis was conducted to consider the influence of treatment satisfaction and opinions concerning treatment on adherence. Results: Responses were collected from 112 caregivers. The caregiver's age being 30-39 years old, the primary caregiver being male, the primary caregiver being employed, and low functional health literacy for the caregiver were associated with poor adherence. Patients being pre-elementary school age was also associated with poor adherence. Low satisfaction with drug treatment and/or their device and communication with healthcare professionals (HCPs), and lack of agreement with the importance of treatment management (eg, keeping injection records, getting informed about the disease/therapy, reporting non-adherence, and sticking to an administration schedule), were also associated with poor adherence. Conclusion: Strategies to improve treatment adherence among caregivers of pGHD patients in Japan should consider the age, gender, and employment status of the caregiver - as well as their functional literacy. Improvement in satisfaction with the drug or device used, better communication with HCPs, and greater awareness of the importance of treatment management, may also lead to better adherence.

Differences in asthma-related outcomes by anti-IL-5 biologics, omalizumab, and dupilumab based on blood eosinophil counts.

BACKGROUND: Selecting optimal biologics based on type 2 biomarkers has been of interest in severe asthma treatment. However, few direct biomarker stratification-based comparisons have been made. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of anti-IL-5 (mepolizumab, benralizumab), omalizumab, and dupilumab in reducing the number of hospitalizations from asthma and exacerbations across all and eosinophil-stratified subgroups. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using the National Hospital Organization database (2016-2020) was performed. Asthmatic patients using biologics were selected, and the baseline backgrounds of the groups were balanced using inverse probability treatment weighting for propensity scores. Weighted rate ratios (RRs) were obtained using a Poisson regression model. RESULTS: Among the 320 patients with asthma using biologics, 205 (64.1%), 75 (23.4%), and 40 (12.5%) were categorized into the anti-IL-5, omalizumab, and dupilumab groups, respectively. After weighting, there were 47.1, 30.0, and 62.6 hospitalizations per 100 person-years [omalizumab vs. anti-IL-5: weighted RR, 0.61 (0.34-1.08); dupilumab vs. anti-IL-5: 1.48 (0.81-2.72)], and 117.0, 134.6, and 287.3 exacerbations per 100 person-years [omalizumab vs. anti-IL-5: 1.13 (0.83-1.54); dupilumab vs. anti-IL-5: 2.69 (1.91-3.78)] in these respective groups. In patients with eosinophil of ≥ 300/µL, the dupilumab group had more exacerbations compared with the anti-IL-5 group [weighted RR, 2.85 (1.82-4.46)]. In patients with eosinophil of < 300/µL, the omalizumab group had fewer hospitalizations compared with the anti-IL-5 group [weighted RR, 0.32 (0.13-0.51)]. CONCLUSION: Anti-IL-5 biologics may be more effective than dupilumab in patients with high blood eosinophil counts, while less effective than omalizumab in patients with low eosinophil counts.

Difference between days of therapy and days of antibiotic spectrum coverage in an inpatient antimicrobial stewardship program: Vector autoregressive models for time-series analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The days of therapy (DOT) metric, used to estimate antimicrobial consumption, has some limitations. Days of antibiotic spectrum coverage (DASC), a novel metric, overcomes these limitations. We examined the difference between these 2 metrics of inpatient intravenous antimicrobial consumption in assessing antimicrobial stewardship efficacy and antimicrobial resistance using vector autoregressive (VAR) models with time-series analysis. METHODS: Differences between DOT and DASC were investigated at a tertiary-care center over 8 years using VAR models with 3 variables in the following order: (1) the monthly proportion of prospective audit and feedback (PAF) acceptance as an index of antimicrobial stewardship efficacy; (2) monthly DOT and DASC adjusted by 1,000 days present as indices of antimicrobial consumption; and (3) the monthly incidence of 5 organisms as an index of antimicrobial resistance. RESULTS: The Granger causality test, which evaluates whether incorporating lagged variables can help predict other variables, showed that PAF activity contributed to DOT and DASC, which, in turn, contributed to the incidence of drug-resistant P. aeruginosa. Notably, only DASC helped predict the incidence of drug-resistant Enterobacterales. Another VAR analysis demonstrated that a high proportion of PAF acceptance was accompanied by decreased DASC in a given month, whereas increased DASC was accompanied by an increased incidence of drug-resistant Enterobacterales, unlike with DOT. CONCLUSIONS: The VAR models of PAF activity, antimicrobial consumption, and antimicrobial resistance suggested that DASC may more accurately reflect the impact of PAF on antimicrobial consumption and be superior to DOT for predicting the incidence of drug-resistant Enterobacterales.

Treatment patterns and cost estimations of systemic chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer in Japan: A retrospective database study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to clarify the treatment patterns of pancreatic cancer patients receiving systemic chemotherapy in Japan and to estimate the direct medical costs in actual practice. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used electronic health record data between April 2008 and December 2018 in Japan. Participants had a confirmed pancreatic cancer diagnosis and received at least one systemic chemotherapy, including FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and S-1. The outcomes were treatment patterns and monthly medical costs and the distribution of monthly medical costs across healthcare resource categories. RESULTS: Of the 4514 selected patients, 40.7%, 7.1%, 24.4%, and 21.3% used gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine, and S-1 as first-line chemotherapy, respectively. The median monthly medical costs were the highest in the first month, with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel ranking first (6813 USD), followed by FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine, and S-1. The health resource categories with the highest shares of monthly medical costs during the first-line treatment period with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and FOLFIRINOX were hospitalization costs (FOLFIRINOX: 41%-37%; gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel: 40%-34%) and medicine costs (FOLFIRINOX: 51%-42%; gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel: 49%-38%). CONCLUSIONS: This study sheds light on the current treatment patterns and direct medical costs of systemic chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer in Japan.

Risk of major congenital malformations associated with first-trimester antihypertensives, including amlodipine and methyldopa: A large claims database study 2010-2019.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the major congenital malformation (MCM) risk of first-trimester antihypertensive exposure, specifically of amlodipine and methyldopa. STUDY DESIGN: A large administrative claims database was used. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The prevalence of antihypertensive prescriptions during pregnancy was described in 91,390 women giving birth between 2010 and 2019. The MCM risk of first-trimester antihypertensives was evaluated in 1,185 women diagnosed with hypertensive disorders in the first trimester. The MCM risk of first-trimester amlodipine and methyldopa was evaluated in 178 women who were prescribed antihypertensives in the first trimester. RESULTS: Antihypertensives were prescribed to 278 (0.30%) women during their first trimester. The prescription prevalence in the first trimester was highest for methyldopa (115, 0.13%), followed by amlodipine (55, 0.06%). Antihypertensives were prescribed to 2,955 (3.23%) women during pregnancy. Nifedipine (903, 0.99%) and nicardipine (758, 0.83%) were the most frequently prescribed oral and injectable antihypertensives during pregnancy, both with a significant increase in annual prevalence. Of the 1,185 women diagnosed with hypertensive disorders in the first trimester, antihypertensives were prescribed to 178 women. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of MCMs in the first-trimester prescription of any antihypertensive medication was 1.124 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.618-2.045). Amlodipine and methyldopa were prescribed to 44 and 93 of the 178 women, respectively. The aORs of MCMs in the first-trimester prescription of amlodipine and methyldopa were 1.219 (95% CI, 0.400-3.721) and 0.921 (0.331-2.564), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The MCM risk of first-trimester exposure to antihypertensives, including amlodipine and methyldopa, was not suggested.

Comparative effectiveness of long-acting injectable antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of different long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) (aripiprazole, paliperidone, risperidone, and fluphenazine/haloperidol) in patients with schizophrenia in Japan. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using two administrative claims databases. The study population consisted of outpatients with schizophrenia who initiated LAIs between May 1, 2015, and November 30, 2019. We directly compared the risk of psychiatric hospitalization and LAI discontinuation among the LAIs based on hazard ratios (HRs) using Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: The numbers of eligible patients who initiated aripiprazole, paliperidone, risperidone, and fluphenazine/haloperidol were 303, 124, 73, and 123, respectively. Regarding psychiatric hospitalization, aripiprazole and paliperidone were associated with significantly lower risk compared to fluphenazine/haloperidol (HR of aripiprazole: 0.47, 95 % CI: 0.28-0.78, HR of paliperidone: 0.50, 95 % CI: 0.28-0.89); HR of risperidone showed the same trend as the aripiprazole and paliperidone. Regarding LAI discontinuation, aripiprazole and paliperidone were associated with significantly lower risk of LAI discontinuation compared to fluphenazine/haloperidol (HR of aripiprazole: 0.53, 95 % CI: 95 % CI: 0.35-0.80, HR of paliperidone: 0.57, 95 % CI: 0.35-0.92). Aripiprazole was also associated with a significantly lower risk compared to risperidone (HR: 0.56, 95 % CI: 0.32-0.98). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that aripiprazole and paliperidone are superior to fluphenazine/haloperidol in the risk of psychiatric hospitalization and LAI discontinuation. Aripiprazole is superior to risperidone in the risk of LAI discontinuation.

Survey of Anaphylaxis during Rasburicase Re-Administration in Patients with Hematological Malignancies Using a Japanese Claims Database.

Management of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) associated with cancer chemotherapy for malignant tumors is important because of its potentially fatal course. The use of rasburicase, a recombinant urate oxidase, is recommended for TLS; however, because rasburicase is an enzymatic drug, one should be cautious of anaphylaxis during administration. Using claims data in Japan, we investigated the rate of rasburicase re-administration and the occurrence of anaphylaxis during re-administration in patients with hematopoietic malignancies in a multicenter setting. Re-administration of rasburicase was defined as administration after an interval of 21 days from the first dose. Of 373 patients, 18 were re-administered rasburicase (re-administration rate: 4.8%). No patient developed anaphylaxis. The median number of days from the first to the last dose of rasburicase was 256.5 days (interquartile range: 138.8-455.8 days). The median daily dose was 7.5 mg (4.5-11.3 mg), and the median total dose was 33.8 mg (19.1-64.1 mg). This claims database analysis revealed that the re-administration rate of rasburicase was low in Japanese patients with hematopoietic malignancies, suggesting that rasburicase was being used appropriately, and that associated anaphylaxis was not observed.

Changes in intravenous and oral antimicrobial prescriptions during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: an experience at a tertiary-care center.

Antimicrobial use during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic at a tertiary-care center was analyzed using interrupted time-series analysis. Among intravenous antimicrobials, the use of azithromycin and third-generation cephalosporins significantly decreased during the current pandemic. Similarly, the use of oral antimicrobials, including azithromycin and fluoroquinolones, also decreased.

Cost and healthcare utilization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia estimated from linked antimicrobial resistance surveillance and hospital claims data in Japan.

Objective: To compare the incremental costs and healthcare utilization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia with those of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) bacteremia. Design: Retrospective cohort study using data from April 2014 to March 2015. Setting: Antimicrobial resistance surveillance and hospital claims data from 16 Japanese hospitals. Patients: The study included 73 patients with S. aureus bacteremia: 23 with MRSA and 50 with MSSA. Methods: MRSA bacteremia was identified using blood cultures and drug-susceptibility tests. MRSA- and MSSA-related medical practices were evaluated. The costs were calculated and compared. All the medical costs were classified into empirical and definitive therapy periods and expressed in Japanese yen (JPY, 1 USD = 106 JPY). Additionally, costs at aggressive and passive bacterial test-performing facilities were compared. Results: No significant differences existed in MRSA-related resource use per patient episode between MRSA and MSSA bacteremia during empirical therapy. However, during definitive therapy, in MRSA bacteremia compared with MSSA bacteremia, this difference was higher. The average MRSA-related costs of empirical therapy for MRSA and MSSA were 13,380 and 9,140 JPY (126 and 86 USD) per patient, and for definitive therapy, they were 69,810 and 29,510 JPY (659 and 278 USD) per patient, respectively. No significant differences were noted. Conversely, the average examination costs during definitive therapy differed significantly: 9,740 vs 3,850 JPY (92 vs 36 USD), respectively (P = .0294). Furthermore, the incremental costs in aggressive facilities were lower for the definitive therapy period than those in passive facilities. Conclusions: In the definitive therapy period, MRSA bacteremia had higher incremental costs and greater use of healthcare resources. In addition, the incremental costs in aggressive facilities were lower than those in passive facilities.

Health state utility values for metastatic pancreatic cancer using a composite time trade-off based on the vignette-based approach in Japan.

BACKGROUNDS: Limited information is available on the utility values of metastatic pancreatic cancer, focusing on different health statuses, selected chemotherapy, and related grades 1/2 and 3/4 adverse events (AEs). We evaluated Japanese societal-based health-related utility values for metastatic pancreatic cancer by considering different grade toxicities commonly associated with chemotherapy using the vignette-based method. METHODS: We developed health status scenarios for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer undergoing chemotherapy and conducted utility research using the developed scenarios in four steps: 'literature review,' 'exploratory interview,' 'content validation', and 'utility research'. In the development process, to consider the impact of AEs of chemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer on health state utility values, we selected neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, and neuropathy as representative AEs. Each AE was classified as either grade 1/2 or 3/4. We confirmed our created scenarios through cognitive interviews with the general population and clinical experts to validate the content. Finally, we developed 11 scenarios for using 'utility research,' evaluated in a societal-based valuation study using the face-to-face method. Participants for 'utility research' were the general population, and they evaluated these scenarios in the composite time trade-off (cTTO) and visual analog scale (VAS) of the European quality of life (EuroQol) valuation technology to derive health state utility scores. RESULTS: Of 220 responders who completed this survey, 201 were adapted into the analysis population. Stable disease with no AEs (reference state) had a mean utility value of 0.653 using cTTO. The lowest mean utility score in the stable state was 0.242 (stable disease + grade 3/4 vomiting). VAS results ranged from 0.189 to 0.468, depending on the various grades of AEs in stable disease. In addition, grade 3/4 AEs and grade 1/2 nausea/vomiting were associated with significantly greater disutility. Utility values were also strongly influenced by the direct impact of AE on physical symptoms, severity and their experience. In addition, 95.9% of the respondents agreed that they understood the questions in the post-response questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: We clarified the health state utility values of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer based on the general population in Japan. The effect on utilities should be considered not only for serious AEs, but also for minor AEs.

Perception of Adherence to Daily Human Growth Hormone Treatments Among Pediatric and Adolescent Patients in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Physicians and Caregivers.

Background: Poor adherence to daily human growth hormone (hGH) treatment has been shown to be associated with poor clinical outcomes for growth hormone deficiency (GHD) patients. However, few studies have examined the perception of adherence to hGH treatment among both physicians and caregivers in Japan. Objective: The aim of this study is to examine the perception of adherence for daily hGH treatment among physicians and caregivers of pediatric and adolescent patients treated with GH in Japan. Moreover, we explore reasons for skipping treatment and the potential impact of a once-weekly treatment on adherence. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Japan among physicians that prescribe daily hGH treatment and caregivers that have administered daily hGH treatment to children/adolescents for 3 months or longer. The Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) was used to gauge perceived adherence for both physician and caregiver groups. Caregivers were also questioned regarding reasons for missing injections. Moreover, both groups were asked about the impact of a once-weekly treatment on adherence. Results: Responses were collected from 123 physicians and 112 caregivers. Physicians reported that 18.1% of patients have poor adherence based on the MMAS-8 instrument. In contrast, 32.1% of the caregivers reported poor adherence. "Simply forgetting", "Patient refused/resisted", and being "Busy with school activities, etc" were the most commonly selected reasons by caregivers for missing an injection. Physicians felt that a once-weekly injection could improve adherence for 64.5% of patients with poor adherence. Moreover, 56.9% of the caregivers that reported an experience of missed injections felt that a once-weekly injection would improve their adherence. Conclusion: Approaches to improve adherence to hGH treatment in Japan are continuously needed. While further research is needed to understand factors most likely to improve adherence, availability of a once-weekly treatment is expected to help improve adherence.

Invasive Fungal Disease in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in Japan: A Retrospective Database Study.

Invasive fungal disease (IFD) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with hematological malignancies. As chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a rare hematological malignancy in Japan, IFD incidence in Japanese patients with CLL is unclear. This study aimed to investigate IFD incidence in Japanese patients with CLL. This retrospective cohort study used data of patients with CLL registered between April 2008 and December 2019 in the Medical Data Vision database (n = 3484). IFD incidence after CLL diagnosis in the watch-and-wait (WW) and drug therapy (DT) groups was 1.5% and 9.2%, respectively. The most common type of IFD was invasive aspergillosis (28.1%). Cox proportional hazards multivariate analysis revealed that DT (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.13) and steroid use (HR: 4.19) were significantly associated with IFD occurrence. IFD incidence was significantly higher in the DT group than in the WW group (log-rank p < 0.001); however, there was no significant between-group difference in the time to IFD onset or the type of IFD (p = 0.09). This study determined the incidence of IFD in patients with CLL during WW. Physicians should monitor for IFD, even among patients with CLL undergoing the WW protocol.

[Impact of Change in Community Pharmacists' Role on Their Estimated Demand].

Pharmacists play a key role in optimizing the safe and effective use of medicines in the super-aged society in Japan. Recently, community pharmacists' role has been transformed and expanded to provide patient-centered care. This study aimed to simulate a change in the demand for community pharmacists resulting from this shift in their role, from 2019 to 2035. The change in demand was estimated by the number of prescriptions obtained from publicly available sources of information. The number of required community pharmacists was calculated separately for full-time and part-time pharmacists and the pharmacists engaged in home medical care. This number was calculated using the estimated demand, the number of prescriptions dispensed per day, and annual working days. We evaluated the effect of changes in the working conditions, which include changes in the dispensing process time, rate of part-time staff and their work time, and number of home medical care per day, on the number of community pharmacists. When the number of prescriptions dispensed per day was set at 19.8, the demand for community pharmacists was estimated as 188,314 in 2035. Furthermore, due to the changes in the working conditions, the demand is expected to change from 153,362 to 266,944. Although the increasing provision of drug information time leads to an increasing number of pharmacists, combining it with work efficiency services could prevent or decrease it. The optimal supply and demand balance of community pharmacists should be determined by both, promoting pharmaceutical care services and improving work efficiency.

[Clinical Research in Communities and the Importance of Patient Information].

In collaboration with community pharmacists, we have conducted research including drug utilization reviews since 2009 and patient registry and long-term follow-up since 2013. The results of these projects have influenced the establishment of healthcare policies and pharmacists' roles. Moreover, the number of clinical studies using electronic medical records by hospital pharmacists has increased. Findings from real-world clinical practice provide useful evidence to improve the quality of patient care provided by clinical pharmacists. When comparing research between community and hospital pharmacists, differences are observed in the efficiency of using patients' information. In hospitals, patients' medical records are important for sharing information among healthcare providers. However, in communities, the importance of maintaining patients' information tends to follow dispensing medications and counseling. This practice results in a lack of data for clinical research. Studies in community pharmacies would deepen our understanding of the needs for patient records and improve the quality of patient care.

Nutrition-related risk and severe hypoglycemia in older adult outpatients with and without diabetes.

In this study, 17 patients with severe hypoglycemia were assessed for nutrition-related risk using the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI). The results showed that 13 of the 17 patients had nutrition-related risk. Hypoglycemia should be noted in patients with problems on GNRI, with or without diabetes.

Clinical Implication of the Relationship between Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control Activities in Japanese Hospitals: A Principal Component Analysis-Based Cluster Analysis.

There are few multicenter investigations regarding the relationship between antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and infection-control activities in Japanese hospitals. Hence, we aimed to identify Japanese hospital subgroups based on facility characteristics and infection-control activities. Moreover, we evaluated the relationship between AMR and hospital subgroups. We conducted a cross-sectional study using administrative claims data and antimicrobial susceptibility data in 124 hospitals from April 2016 to March 2017. Hospitals were classified using cluster analysis based the principal component analysis-transformed data. We assessed the relationship between each cluster and AMR using analysis of variance. Ten variables were selected and transformed into four principal components, and five clusters were identified. Cluster 5 had high infection control activity. Cluster 2 had partially lower activity of infection control than the other clusters. Clusters 3 and 4 had a higher rate of surgeries than Cluster 1. The methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)/S. aureus detection rate was lowest in Cluster 1, followed, respectively, by Clusters 5, 2, 4, and 3. The MRSA/S. aureus detection rate differed significantly between Clusters 4 and 5 (p = 0.0046). Our findings suggest that aggressive examination practices are associated with low AMR whereas surgeries, an infection risk factor, are associated with high AMR.

Comparative Outcomes of First-Line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Among the Regimens Used in Japan: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Importance: Various first-line chemotherapy treatment regimens for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer have been approved in Japan, including gemcitabine (GEM); fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combination (FOLFIRINOX); GEM plus albumin-bound paclitaxel (GEM+NPTX), and S-1 (tegafur + gimeracil + oteracil). However, direct comparisons of these chemotherapy regimens are limited. Objective: To assess the short-term and long-term outcomes associated with first-line chemotherapy regimens for metastatic pancreatic cancer compared with chemotherapy regimens recommended in Japanese guidelines. Data Sources: In this systematic review and network meta-analysis, the bibliographic databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, as well as medical journals published between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2018, were searched for clinical trials comparing chemotherapy regimens. Study Selection: Randomized 2-arm clinical trials evaluating first-line chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions was followed for data abstractions. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. The SIGN 50 Quality Assessment Instrument was used to assess the risk of bias and overall study quality of the selected trials. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was overall survival (OS), and the secondary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) compared with GEM for first-line chemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer. The Kaplan-Meier curve of GEM from the literature and the estimated hazard ratios (HRs) were used to model the long-term associations to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) (person-months) for OS and PFS of each chemotherapy. Sensitivity analyses with multiple functional models were conducted to confirm the long-term estimations. Results: A total of 22 regimens (25 studies) for OS and a total of 18 regimens (21 studies) for PFS were identified from literature. The total number of participants was 10 186, with 5856 male (57.5%) and 4330 female (42.5%). The FOLFIRINOX and GEM+NPTX regimens were associated with reduction in the risk of death, with an HR of 0.57 (95% CI, 0.41-0.79) and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.55-0.95) compared with GEM, respectively. The curve estimation also showed that FOLFIRINOX had the largest AUC for survival at 15.49 person-months (range, 13.84-15.51 person-months), followed by GEM+NPTX with 12.36 person-months (range, 10.98-12.59 person-months), GEM+ERLO with 10.84 person-months (range, 9.66-11.23 person-months), S-1 with 8.44 person-months (range, 8.26-9.74 person-months), and GEM with 8.10 person-months (range, 7.93-9.38 person-months). Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this network meta-analysis support the relative short-term and long-term outcomes associated with first-line chemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer used clinically in Japan.